Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Home
Communities
My Communities
Directories
Company Directory
Member Directory
Staff Directory
Browse
Announcements
Discussion Posts
Upcoming Events
Library Resource Hub
Federal Contractor Corner
DirectEmployers Blog
DirectEmployers Photos
DEAMcon
Log in
Public Resource Center
×
Back to Library
20250625 | Why the Trump Administration’s Retreat from Disparate Impact Doesn’t Fundamentally Change the Legal Basis for Employer Analysis of Selection Decisions
Recommend
06-25-2025 01:38 PM
Connect Crew
For closed captioning, please view the recording here:
https://vimeo.com/1096669552
. If you need HRCI or SHRM credits after viewing this recording, please email kacie@directemployers.org to request the corresponding Program IDs.
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14281 (“Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy”), which directed all federal agencies including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and Department of Justice to “deprioritize enforcement of all statutes and regulations to the extent they include disparate-impact liability.” Disparate impact employment cases allege that a neutral and objective employment practice is unlawful if its effect is different based on any characteristic protected by Title VII or other civil rights laws, and the practice cannot be shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity. Such cases often use statistical evidence as the basis for identifying the claim.
Disparate impact cases are not the only employment discrimination cases that use statistical evidence. Cases alleging a pattern and practice of disparate treatment also rely on statistical evidence. Indeed, the United States Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) nearly always pursued its investigations pursuant to a pattern and practice of disparate treatment theory rather than a disparate impact theory. The EEOC’s current leader also has indicated that the Commission intends to use statistical evidence to demonstrate that DEI programs engage in a pattern and practice of discrimination.
In this webinar, the attorneys from Roffman Horvitz will discuss the current status of disparate impact as a basis for claims of discrimination in employment, the differences between disparate treatment pattern and practice cases and disparate impact cases, and how statistical analysis serves as the core basis for claims pursued under either theory. They will discuss how the Administration’s Executive Order does little to change the utility of using statistical analysis to evaluate selection decisions (i.e., hires, promotions, terminations).
#ComplianceWebinar
#Webinars
#OFCCPCompliance
#EEO
#affirmativeaction
#EEOC
Statistics
0 Favorited
24 Views
2 Files
0 Shares
7 Downloads
Video
779d58ef-3d65-aa31-58a8-f121aa6debd6_file
01:00:27
Attachment(s)
20250625_Disparate-Impact-Webinar.pdf
273 KB
1 version
Uploaded - 06-25-2025
Download
Download Document
Please accept the terms of the copyright associated with this attachment before downloading it. Click the link below to read the terms.
Accept
Related Entries and Links
No Related Resource entered.
© 2025 DirectEmployers Association, Inc.
Powered by Higher Logic